Once again my readership says, "he's lost his marbles, but I'm going to
finish reading, because he just might be on to something." Woodward's
book "Veil: Covert Ops 1981-1985," offers complete proof of the truth
of the title. This book allegedly tells the story of the Iran-Contra
dealings and CIA ops of the Reagan presidency 1981-1985. This book
proves that nothing in it can be believed. This is a story about CIA
activities relating to the White House. That would be CIA. They have
named a building after George H. W. Bush. He was head of the CIA before
Reagan/Bush became Pres/VP. This book about CIA operations doesn't even
mention George H. W. Bush's name, unless at the beginning he acknowledges
that he's simply the Vice President. CIA operations out of the White
House, run by a laissez-faire President who delegates, and we're going
to be misled into believing someone besides George H.W. Bush, with his
total CIA experience and convenient proximity to the Presidency, is the
person who is going to run this operation. George's name does not even
come up in this book. If that doesn't tell you something, stop reading,
because there is no hope for you.
It told me something. Woodward must have an I.O.U. to Bush. That
would be a really big I.O.U. when, as an investigator, you leave the
most likely suspect out of your unsolved report. Now what could that
I.O.U. possibly be? It would have to be a big one for a journalist to
risk his reputation. George H.W. Bush="Deep Throat." Who was Nixon's
ambassador to the U.N.? Who was a CIA agent with access to all the
intelligence files, plus inside the loop at the White House? Would Bush
engineer the fall of Nixon to try to get Nixon's job? Deep Throat had
to have White House access, plus intelligence files, plus an ax to grind,
or he would have revealed himself as a patriot. Bush and the CIA. He
still gets weekly CIA briefings, and he's not in any office, but we're
led to believe that during the Reagan/Bush administration he was not in
the loop at the CIA or Iran Contra, etc. Would Woodward's efforts
qualify as "whore press?"
No case to be made, you suggest. Like Hinckley Sr./Bush Sr./business
acquaintences/1970, like Hinckley Jr./W/Lubbock/same 1970's, like bin
Laden/Bush/business partners/1990's, like Hinckley Jr./Reagan/Heartbeat/
Bush/President/missed the trifecta, like WTC/Bush/binLaden/trifecta, and
we can spin ad infinitum. I'm just a little dumbfounded by the fact that
John Hinckley and Osama bin Laden are intertwined into these personal
lives and then manifest themselves on the world stage as the Supreme
villians. I'll be sure to check with Woodward on the facts.

< http://read.at/daves >

< http://www.home.eznet.net/~dmfagan/home.eznet.net/index.html >