Global Warming.

What are you talking about? That's ridiculous. Hasn't it been proven that it's natural cycles? Ph.d's ("piled higher and deeper") papers have argued in favor of natural cycles. That may be influenced by paychecks which wouldn't happen if their results supported "Global Warming." Let's not pile it high and deep. I left the burner on in my house the other morning and when I returned later, it was hot as hell in the house. I shut the burner off. Heat stopped building up, house cooled. Let's use this analogy, because we can easily relate to it, realistically.

We are burning all the petrofuels we can find, all over the world, all at the same time, all day and all night. Golly gee, I am wondering if the heat will build up, because we don't shut the burners off in our world house. I'm probably just stupid, but I can't see the woods because the forest has been burned down. Once again. If I leave the fires burning in my house, it gets hotter in my house. I've noticed standing near big fires is always hot. More fire, more hot. Could this little petrofuel burner problem be making heat? All over the world? All at the same time, full time. All day and all night.

Could Ph.d's paid by the petrofuel companies be wrong? Why would the petrofuel companies lie to us to keep the very big dollars flowing? This is just the tip of the iceberg. Check energy policy and money trails to achieve enlightenment. Do you know where the energy goes? I don't want to give away any secrets, but look at any smokestack or cooling tower, or exhaust pipe, and if you can reclaim the lost heat here, it probably won't be necessary to drill in the Artic for about 100 years.